China vs Denmark: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
China
23.95 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark
24.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
28th
Denmark rank
25th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- China
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 24.5 DB17-20 methodology against 23.95 DB17-20 methodology in China, a difference of 0.55 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
China ranks 28th and Denmark ranks 25th of 187 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), China or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 24.5 DB17-20 methodology against 23.95 DB17-20 methodology in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between China and Denmark?
- 0.55 DB17-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Denmark rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- China ranks 28th and Denmark ranks 25th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.