Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark

Denmark: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 24.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
24.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
25th
of 187 countries
All-time high
24.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
24.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark, 2015–2019

05101520252015201720192015: 24.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 24.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 24.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 24.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 24.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark stood at 24.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Denmark ranks 25th of 187 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Denmark, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 24.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 24.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 24.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 24.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 24.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Denmark

  1. 23 Czechia 25 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 23 North Macedonia 25 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 26 France 24 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 26 Kyrgyzstan 24 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 28 China 23.95 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Denmark

All data for Denmark →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark was 24.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Denmark?
The highest recorded value was 24.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Denmark?
The lowest recorded value was 24.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Denmark rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Denmark ranks 25th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Denmark data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/denmark/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Denmark</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.