Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Congo
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo rank
181st
Equatorial Guinea rank
179th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 179th of 187 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 4 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Congo ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 179th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.