Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Congo
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo rank
181st
Guinea-Bissau rank
183rd
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Congo
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 181st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 183rd of 187 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
- Congo, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Congo ranks 181st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 183rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.