Finland vs Malaysia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Finland
26.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
26.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland rank
11th
Malaysia rank
11th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Finland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 26.5 DB17-20 methodology against 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 11th and Malaysia ranks 11th of 187 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Finland or Malaysia?
- Finland, at 26.5 DB17-20 methodology against 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Finland and Malaysia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Malaysia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Finland ranks 11th and Malaysia ranks 11th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.