Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia

Malaysia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
26.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
11th
of 187 countries
All-time high
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
26.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 26.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 26.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia stood at 26.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of down 3.6% over five years.

Malaysia ranks 11th of 187 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Malaysia, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 27.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 27.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 27.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 26.5 DB17-20 methodology -3.6%
2019 26.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Malaysia

  1. 10 Turkey 27 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 11 Finland 26.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 11 Iceland 26.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 11 Italy 26.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 11 New Zealand 26.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Malaysia

All data for Malaysia →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia was 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Malaysia?
The highest recorded value was 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Malaysia?
The lowest recorded value was 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
How does Malaysia rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Malaysia ranks 11th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Malaysia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/malaysia/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Malaysia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.