Hong Kong vs South Korea: Registering property: Quality of land administration index … 0-30
Hong Kong
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
6th
South Korea rank
6th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index … 0-30 over time
- Hong Kong
- South Korea
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 27.5 DB17-20 methodology against 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Korea, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 6th and South Korea ranks 6th of 187 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Hong Kong or South Korea?
- Hong Kong, at 27.5 DB17-20 methodology against 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Hong Kong and South Korea?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and South Korea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and South Korea rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Hong Kong ranks 6th and South Korea ranks 6th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.