Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea

South Korea: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 187 countries
All-time high
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
27.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 27.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea stood at 27.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

That places South Korea 6th out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in South Korea, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 27.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 27.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 27.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 27.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 27.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near South Korea

  1. 6 Estonia 27.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 6 Hong Kong 27.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 6 Sweden 27.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for South Korea

All data for South Korea →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea was 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in South Korea?
The highest recorded value was 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in South Korea?
The lowest recorded value was 27.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does South Korea rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
South Korea ranks 6th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this South Korea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/korea-rep/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in South Korea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.