India vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
India
10.82 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
10.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
India rank
117th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
118th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- India
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
India currently reports 10.82 DB17-20 methodology against 10.5 DB17-20 methodology in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.32 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
India ranks 117th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 187 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), India or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- India, at 10.82 DB17-20 methodology against 10.5 DB17-20 methodology in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between India and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0.32 DB17-20 methodology, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do India and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- India ranks 117th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.