Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in India

India: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 10.82 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
10.82 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
117th
of 187 countries
All-time high
10.82 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
8.44 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in India, 2015–2019

02.557.5102015201720192015: 8.4 DB17-20 methodology2016: 8.4 DB17-20 methodology2017: 8.9 DB17-20 methodology2018: 10.8 DB17-20 methodology2019: 10.8 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in India stood at 10.82 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 28.2% over five years.

India ranks 117th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in India, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in India, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 8.44 DB17-20 methodology
2016 8.44 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 8.91 DB17-20 methodology +5.6%
2018 10.82 DB17-20 methodology +21.4%
2019 10.82 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near India

  1. 118 Barbados 10.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 118 Botswana 10.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 118 Iraq 10.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 118 Lao People's Democratic Republic 10.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 118 Malawi 10.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 118 Uganda 10.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for India

All data for India →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in India?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in India was 10.82 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in India?
The highest recorded value was 10.82 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in India?
The lowest recorded value was 8.44 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does India rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
India ranks 117th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this India data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in India. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/india/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in India</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.