Jordan vs Latvia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Jordan
22.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
22.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Jordan rank
39th
Latvia rank
39th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Jordan
- Latvia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 22.5 DB17-20 methodology against 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 39th of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Jordan or Latvia?
- Jordan, at 22.5 DB17-20 methodology against 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Jordan and Latvia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Jordan ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 39th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.