Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia

Latvia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
22.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
39th
of 187 countries
All-time high
23 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
22.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia, 2015–2019

05101520252015201720192015: 23 DB17-20 methodology2016: 23 DB17-20 methodology2017: 23 DB17-20 methodology2018: 22.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 22.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Latvia recorded 22.5 DB17-20 methodology for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.2% over five years.

Latvia ranks 39th of 187 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Latvia, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 23 DB17-20 methodology
2016 23 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 23 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 22.5 DB17-20 methodology -2.2%
2019 22.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 39 Armenia 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 39 Azerbaijan 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 39 Israel 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 39 Jordan 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 39 Mauritius 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 39 Spain 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 39 Uruguay 22.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia was 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 23 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
How does Latvia rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Latvia ranks 39th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/latvia/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.