Latvia vs Mauritius: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Latvia
22.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius
22.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
39th
Mauritius rank
39th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 22.5 DB17-20 methodology against 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in Mauritius, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 39th and Mauritius ranks 39th of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Latvia or Mauritius?
- Latvia, at 22.5 DB17-20 methodology against 22.5 DB17-20 methodology in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Latvia ranks 39th and Mauritius ranks 39th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.