Malaysia vs New Zealand: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Malaysia
26.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
26.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
11th
New Zealand rank
11th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 26.5 DB17-20 methodology against 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 187 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Malaysia or New Zealand?
- Malaysia, at 26.5 DB17-20 methodology against 26.5 DB17-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and New Zealand rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Malaysia ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.