Grenada vs Nepal: Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)

Grenada
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Nepal
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada rank
141st
Nepal rank
141st

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) over time

  • Grenada
  • Nepal
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Nepal, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 141st and Nepal ranks 141st of 187 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8), Grenada or Nepal?
Grenada, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Nepal as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) between Grenada and Nepal?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Nepal?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Nepal rank globally for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)?
Grenada ranks 141st and Nepal ranks 141st of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Nepal: Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/registering-property-reliability-of-infrastructure-index-0-8-db16-20-methodology/grenada/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/registering-property-reliability-of-infrastructure-index-0-8-db16-20-methodology/grenada/nepal/">Grenada vs Nepal: Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an electronic database for checking for encumbrances; (iii) how maps of land plots are kept at the mapping agency of the largest business city of the economy; (iv) whether there is a geographic information system—an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information; (v) how the land ownership registry and mapping agency are linked; and (vi) how immovable property is identified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.