Statizoid

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) by country

The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an...

Countries reporting
186
Highest
8 DB16-20 methodology
United Arab Emirates
Lowest
0 DB16-20 methodology
Zambia
Median
5 DB16-20 methodology
Years covered
5
2015–2019
Data points
930

What the numbers show

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) is currently reported for 186 countries. The highest value is 8 DB16-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates; the lowest is 0 DB16-20 methodology in Zambia.

The median across all reporting countries is 5 DB16-20 methodology, and the mean is 4.16 DB16-20 methodology.

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 United Arab Emirates 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Azerbaijan, Republic of 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
1 China, People's Republic of 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
1 Czechia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Estonia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Finland 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 United Kingdom 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Georgia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Hong Kong (China) 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
1 Hungary 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Ireland 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Israel 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
1 Italy 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Japan 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Korea 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Lithuania 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Luxembourg 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Latvia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Moldova, Republic of 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 North Macedonia, Republic of 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 New Zealand 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Qatar 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Russian Federation 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Rwanda 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Singapore 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Sweden 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 TΓΌrkiye 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Taiwan Province of China 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Armenia, Republic of 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
29 Australia 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Austria 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Belarus, Republic of 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
29 Bhutan 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Canada 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Switzerland 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Cyprus 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Germany 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Denmark 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Spain 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 France 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Iceland 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Jordan 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Kenya 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Morocco 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Montenegro 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Mauritius 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
29 Malaysia 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Netherlands 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Norway 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Peru 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Poland 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Puerto Rico 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
29 Uruguay 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 United States 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
29 Kosovo 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Albania 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Antigua and Barbuda 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Bulgaria 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Bahrain, Kingdom of 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Colombia 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Dominican Republic 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Croatia, Republic of 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
56 Iran, Islamic Republic of 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Kazakhstan, Republic of 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Kyrgyz Republic 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Malta 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Portugal 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Slovak Republic 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Slovenia 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Eswatini, Kingdom of 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Seychelles 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
56 Vietnam 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Vanuatu 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
56 Samoa 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Argentina 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Belgium 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Belize 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Brunei Darussalam 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Costa Rica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Indonesia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
75 Jamaica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Mexico 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
75 Oman 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Palestine 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Romania 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
75 Saudi Arabia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
75 El Salvador 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 San Marino, Republic of 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Serbia, Republic of 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
75 Suriname 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
75 Ukraine 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 Uzbekistan, Republic of 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
75 South Africa 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
95 Brazil 4.61 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
96 Nigeria 4.08 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
97 Barbados 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Ecuador 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Fiji, Republic of 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Guatemala 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Honduras 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Lebanon 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Mongolia 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Thailand 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
97 Trinidad and Tobago 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
97 Tunisia 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
107 India 3.88 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
108 CΓ΄te d'Ivoire 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Cabo Verde 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
108 Djibouti 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
108 Kuwait 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Sri Lanka 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
108 Lesotho, Kingdom of 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Panama 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Palau, Republic of 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Paraguay 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Sudan 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Chad 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
108 Uganda 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
120 Pakistan 2.1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
121 Burkina Faso 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Bolivia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Chile 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Comoros, Union of the 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Egypt, Arab Republic of 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
121 Eritrea, The State of 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Lao People's Democratic Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 St. Lucia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Mozambique, Republic of 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Namibia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
121 Philippines 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
121 Somalia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Syrian Arab Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
121 Tonga 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Angola 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Burundi 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Benin 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
140 Botswana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Algeria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Ghana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Gambia, The 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Grenada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Guyana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Iraq 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 St. Kitts and Nevis 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Madagascar, Republic of 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Nepal 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Papua New Guinea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Togo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
140 Yemen, Republic of 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
140 Zimbabwe 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Bahamas, The 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Congo, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Dominica 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Equatorial Guinea, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Greece 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Malawi 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Solomon Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 South Sudan, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 SΓ£o TomΓ© and PrΓ­ncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Tanzania, United Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Venezuela, RepΓΊblica Bolivariana de 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
158 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-reliability-of-infrastructure-index-0-8-db16-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-reliability-of-infrastructure-index-0-8-db16-20-methodology/">Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) by country</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 930 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an electronic database for checking for encumbrances; (iii) how maps of land plots are kept at the mapping agency of the largest business city of the economy; (iv) whether there is a geographic information systemβ€”an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information; (v) how the land ownership registry and mapping agency are linked; and (vi) how immovable property is identified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.