Statizoid

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) by country

The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an...

Countries reporting
158
Highest
8 DB16-20 methodology
United Arab Emirates
Lowest
1 DB16-20 methodology
Zimbabwe
Median
5 DB16-20 methodology
Years covered
5
2015–2019
Data points
935

What the numbers show

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) is currently reported for 158 countries. The highest value is 8 DB16-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates; the lowest is 1 DB16-20 methodology in Zimbabwe.

The median across all reporting countries is 5 DB16-20 methodology, and the mean is 4.94 DB16-20 methodology.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 8.

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index … 0-8: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 United Arab Emirates 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Azerbaijan 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
1 China 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
1 Czechia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Estonia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Finland 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 United Kingdom 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Georgia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Hong Kong 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
1 Hungary 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Ireland 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Israel 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
1 Italy 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Japan 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 South Korea 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Lithuania 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Luxembourg 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Latvia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Moldova 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 North Macedonia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 New Zealand 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Qatar 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Russia 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Rwanda 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Singapore 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Sweden 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Turkey 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
1 Taiwan 8 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Armenia 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
29 Australia 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Austria 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Belarus 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
29 Bhutan 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Canada 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Switzerland 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Cyprus 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Germany 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Denmark 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Spain 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 France 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Iceland 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Jordan 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Kenya 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Morocco 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Montenegro 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Mauritius 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
29 Malaysia 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Netherlands 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Norway 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Peru 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Poland 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Puerto Rico 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
29 Uruguay 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 United States 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Kosovo 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
29 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 7 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Albania 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Antigua and Barbuda 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Bulgaria 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Bahrain 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Colombia 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Dominican Republic 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Croatia 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
57 Iran 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Kazakhstan 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Kyrgyzstan 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Malta 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Portugal 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Slovakia 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Slovenia 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Eswatini 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Seychelles 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
57 Vietnam 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Vanuatu 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
57 Samoa 6 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Argentina 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Belgium 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Belize 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Brunei 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Costa Rica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Indonesia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
76 Jamaica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Mexico 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
76 Oman 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Palestine 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Romania 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
76 Saudi Arabia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
76 El Salvador 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 San Marino 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Serbia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
76 Suriname 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
76 Ukraine 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 Uzbekistan 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
76 South Africa 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
96 Brazil 4.61 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
97 Nigeria 4.08 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
98 Barbados 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Ecuador 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Fiji 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Guatemala 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Honduras 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Lebanon 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Mongolia 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Thailand 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
98 Trinidad and Tobago 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
98 Tunisia 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
108 India 3.88 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
109 Cote d'Ivoire 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Cape Verde 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
109 Djibouti 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
109 Kuwait 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Sri Lanka 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
109 Lesotho 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Panama 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Palau 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Paraguay 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Sudan 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Chad 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
109 Uganda 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
121 Pakistan 2.1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
122 Burkina Faso 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Bolivia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Chile 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Comoros 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
122 Eritrea 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Laos 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Saint Lucia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Mozambique 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Mauritania 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Namibia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
122 Philippines 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
122 Somalia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Syria 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
122 Tonga 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Angola 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Burundi 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Benin 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
141 Botswana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Algeria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Ghana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Gambia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Grenada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Guyana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Iraq 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Madagascar 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Nepal 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Papua New Guinea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Togo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
141 Yemen 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat
141 Zimbabwe 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — flat

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-reliability-of-infrastructure-index-0-8-db16-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-reliability-of-infrastructure-index-0-8-db16-20-methodology/">Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an electronic database for checking for encumbrances; (iii) how maps of land plots are kept at the mapping agency of the largest business city of the economy; (iv) whether there is a geographic information system—an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information; (v) how the land ownership registry and mapping agency are linked; and (vi) how immovable property is identified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.