Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score
Sudan
47.06
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
47.06
in 2019
Sudan rank
163rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
163rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score over time
- Sudan
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 47.06 against 47.06 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 163rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2 | 32.35 | 7.84 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 42.35 | 41.18 | 1.18 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score, Sudan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Sudan, at 47.06 against 47.06 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score between Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Sudan ranks 163rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.