Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score in Tanzania
Tanzania: Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score was 47.06 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score in Tanzania, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score in Tanzania stood at 47.06. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of up 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score in Tanzania peaked at 47.06 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 29.41, in 2003.
That places Tanzania 163rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 29.41 | — |
| 2004 | 29.41 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 29.41 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 29.41 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 35.29 | +20.0% |
| 2008 | 35.29 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 35.29 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 35.29 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 35.29 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 41.18 | +16.7% |
| 2013 | 41.18 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 41.18 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 41.18 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 41.18 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 41.18 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 47.06 | +14.3% |
| 2019 | 47.06 | +0.0% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's 47.06 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 64.71, 73% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's 47.06 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 64.71, 73% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.93 | 29.41 | 35.29 | 7 |
| 2010s | 41.18 | 35.29 | 47.06 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 163 India 47.06 compare
- 163 Central African Republic 47.06 compare
- 163 Costa Rica 47.06 compare
- 163 Libya 47.06 compare
- 163 Mozambique 47.06 compare
- 163 Namibia 47.06 compare
- 163 Sudan 47.06 compare
More private sector data for Tanzania
- Merchandise trade 27.5% (2025)
- Food imports 8.2% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 73.7% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 14.81 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 2.70 billion current US$ (2024)
- Food exports 31.0% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 11.4% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 9.96 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 6.80 billion current US$ (2024)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 141.13 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score in Tanzania?
- Starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score in Tanzania was 47.06 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 47.06 in 2018.
- What is the lowest starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 29.41 in 2003.
- How does Tanzania rank for starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score?
- Tanzania ranks 163rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is starting a business: procedures required - women (number) - score rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.