Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile

Chile: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 75.93 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
75.93
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
41st
of 191 countries
All-time high
75.93
in 2019
All-time low
75.49
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 75.52015: 75.62016: 75.72017: 75.82018: 75.92019: 75.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Chile is 75.93, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 0.6% over ten years.

That places Chile 41st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 75.49 —
2015 75.59 +0.1%
2016 75.7 +0.2%
2017 75.81 +0.1%
2018 75.9 +0.1%
2019 75.93 +0.0%

Chile compared with similar countries

  • Chile's 75.93 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Chile's 75.93 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 65.74, 1.2× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 38 Saint Lucia 76.38 compare
  2. 39 Poland 76.35 compare
  3. 40 Montenegro 76.08 compare
  4. 42 Finland 75.93 compare
  5. 43 Bulgaria 75.93 compare
  6. 44 Botswana 75.58 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Chile?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Chile was 75.93 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 75.93 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 75.49 in 2014.
How does Chile rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Chile ranks 41st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/chile/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.