Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) in Kiribati
Kiribati: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 56 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Kiribati, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kiribati is 56, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kiribati peaked at 60 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 56, in 2007.
Kiribati ranks 107th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 60 | — |
| 2006 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 56 | -6.7% |
| 2008 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 56 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 56 | +0.0% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 56 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 56.88, 98% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 56 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62, 90% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.6 | 56 | 60 | 5 |
| 2010s | 56 | 56 | 56 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 104 Nigeria 58.76 compare
- 105 Bangladesh 56.88 compare
- 106 United States 56.8 compare
- 107 Belize 56 compare
- 107 Botswana 56 compare
- 107 Cameroon 56 compare
- 107 Djibouti 56 compare
- 107 El Salvador 56 compare
- 107 Ghana 56 compare
- 107 Guinea 56 compare
- 107 Iran 56 compare
- 107 Kenya 56 compare
- 107 Malta 56 compare
- 107 Myanmar 56 compare
- 107 Sao Tome and Principe 56 compare
- 107 Seychelles 56 compare
- 107 Sudan 56 compare
- 107 East Timor 56 compare
- 107 Trinidad and Tobago 56 compare
More private sector data for Kiribati
- Merchandise trade 147.8% (2025)
- Food imports 41.4% (2021)
- Manufactures imports 43.0% (2021)
- Merchandise imports 496.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 97.2% (2021)
- Manufactures exports 2.1% (2021)
- Merchandise exports 20.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 146.53 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0573 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -16.67 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kiribati?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Kiribati was 56 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 60 in 2005.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 56 in 2007.
- How does Kiribati rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 107th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.