Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score was 68 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Sri Lanka, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Sri Lanka stood at 68. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 13.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Sri Lanka peaked at 68 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 60, in 2009.
That places Sri Lanka 55th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 64 | — |
| 2006 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 60 | -6.2% |
| 2010 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 64 | +6.7% |
| 2013 | 68 | +6.2% |
| 2014 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 68 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 64 | -5.9% |
| 2017 | 64 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 68 | +6.2% |
| 2019 | 68 | +0.0% |
Sri Lanka compared with similar countries
- Sri Lanka's 68 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 60, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Sri Lanka's 68 is above the median for South Asia, which is 64.48, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.2 | 60 | 64 | 5 |
| 2010s | 65.2 | 60 | 68 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 55 Afghanistan 68 compare
- 55 Colombia 68 compare
- 55 Democratic Republic of Congo 68 compare
- 55 Congo 68 compare
- 55 Equatorial Guinea 68 compare
- 55 Gabon 68 compare
- 55 Guinea-Bissau 68 compare
- 55 Lithuania 68 compare
- 55 Malawi 68 compare
- 55 Netherlands 68 compare
- 55 Qatar 68 compare
- 55 Spain 68 compare
- 55 Switzerland 68 compare
More private sector data for Sri Lanka
- Merchandise trade 32.2% (2025)
- Food imports 15.3% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 59.7% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 21.48 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 27.3% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 66.0% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 13.58 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 624.24 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1248 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 6.33 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Sri Lanka?
- Dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score in Sri Lanka was 68 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 68 in 2013.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 60 in 2009.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 55th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.