Statizoid

Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية

المملكة العربية السعودية: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 185 countries
All-time high
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية, 2014–2019

01232014201620192014: 3 DB16-20 methodology2015: 3 DB16-20 methodology2016: 3 DB16-20 methodology2017: 3 DB16-20 methodology2018: 3 DB16-20 methodology2019: 3 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية stood at 3 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

المملكة العربية السعودية ranks 1st of 185 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Countries ranked near المملكة العربية السعودية

  1. 1 جمهورية الصين الشعبية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 بنغلاديش 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 الهند 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 إندونيسيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 باكستان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 الولايات المتحدة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 الاتحاد الروسي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 1 اليابان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 1 ألبانيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 1 الجزائر 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 1 الأرجنتين 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 1 جمهورية أرمينيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 1 أستراليا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 1 النمسا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 1 جمهورية أذربيجان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 1 جزر البهاما 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 1 مملكة البحرين 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 1 بربادوس 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 1 جمهورية بيلاروس 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 1 بلجيكا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 1 بليز 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 1 بوتان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 1 البوسنة والهرسك 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 1 بوتسوانا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 1 بروني دار السلام 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 1 بلغاريا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 1 بوركينا فاسو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 1 كابو فيردي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 1 كندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 1 تشاد 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 1 شيلي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 1 كولومبيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 1 كوستاريكا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 1 جمهورية كرواتيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 1 قبرص 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 1 الجمهورية التشيكية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 1 الدانمرك 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 1 جيبوتي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  39. 1 الجمهورية الدومينيكية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  40. 1 إكوادور 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 1 جمهورية مصر العربية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  42. 1 السلفادور 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  43. 1 جمهورية إستونيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  44. 1 مملكة إسواتيني 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  45. 1 جمهورية فيجي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  46. 1 فنلندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  47. 1 جورجيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  48. 1 اليونان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  49. 1 غواتيمالا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  50. 1 هندوراس 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  51. 1 منطقة هونغ كونغ الصينية الإدارية الخاصة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  52. 1 هنغاريا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  53. 1 آيسلندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  54. 1 جمهورية إيران الإسلامية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  55. 1 آيرلندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  56. 1 اسرائيل 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  57. 1 إيطاليا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  58. 1 الأردن 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  59. 1 جمهورية كازاخستان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  60. 1 جمهورية كوريا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  61. 1 Kosovo 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  62. 1 الكويت 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  63. 1 جمهورية قيرغيزستان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  64. 1 جمهورية لاو الديمقراطية الشعبية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  65. 1 جمهورية لاتفيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  66. 1 لبنان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  67. 1 جمهورية ليتوانيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  68. 1 لكسمبرغ 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  69. 1 ملاوي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  70. 1 ماليزيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  71. 1 مالطة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  72. 1 موريشيوس 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  73. 1 جمهورية مولدوفا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  74. 1 مونغوليا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  75. 1 الجبل الأسود 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  76. 1 المغرب 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  77. 1 جمهورية موزامبيق 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  78. 1 ميانمار 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  79. 1 ناميبيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  80. 1 نيبال 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  81. 1 هولندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  82. 1 نيوزيلندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  83. 1 جمهورية مقدونيا الشمالية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  84. 1 النرويج 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  85. 1 عُمان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  86. 1 جمهورية بالاو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  87. 1 بنما 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  88. 1 بابوا غينيا الجديدة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  89. 1 باراغواي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  90. 1 بيرو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  91. 1 الفلبين 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  92. 1 البرتغال 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  93. 1 بورتو ريكو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  94. 1 قطر 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  95. 1 رومانيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  96. 1 رواندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  97. 1 جمهورية سان مارينو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  98. 1 جمهورية صربيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  99. 1 سيشل 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  100. 1 سيراليون 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  101. 1 سنغافورة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  102. 1 الجمهورية السلوفاكية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  103. 1 جمهورية سلوفينيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  104. 1 جنوب إفريقيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  105. 1 إسبانيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  106. 1 سري لانكا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  107. 1 سانت كيتس ونيفس 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  108. 1 سانت لوسيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  109. 1 السويد 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  110. 1 سويسرا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  111. 1 مقاطعة تايوان الصينية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  112. 1 جمهورية طاجيكستان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  113. 1 جمهورية تنزانيا المتحدة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  114. 1 تايلند 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  115. 1 تونغا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  116. 1 ترينيداد وتوباغو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  117. 1 تونس 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  118. 1 الجمهورية التركية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  119. 1 أوغندا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  120. 1 أوكرانيا 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  121. 1 الإمارات العربية المتحدة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  122. 1 المملكة المتحدة 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  123. 1 أوروغواي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  124. 1 جمهورية أوزبكستان 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  125. 1 فانواتو 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  126. 1 جمهورية فنزويلا البوليفارية 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  127. 1 فييت نام 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  128. 1 Palestine 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
  129. 1 زمبابوي 3 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More private sector data for المملكة العربية السعودية

All data for المملكة العربية السعودية →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية?
Dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in المملكة العربية السعودية?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in المملكة العربية السعودية?
The lowest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does المملكة العربية السعودية rank for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
المملكة العربية السعودية ranks 1st out of 185 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction rising or falling in المملكة العربية السعودية?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this المملكة العربية السعودية data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-quality-control-after-construction-index-0-3-db16-20/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-quality-control-after-construction-index-0-3-db16-20/saudi-arabia/">Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in المملكة العربية السعودية</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 1,109 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.