Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) was 91.6% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan, 2009–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan is 91.6%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.5% on the previous year and up 20.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 91.6% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 76.1%, in 2009.
That places Kyrgyzstan 129th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 76.1% | — |
| 2010 | 80.0% | +5.1% |
| 2011 | 81.2% | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 84.7% | +4.2% |
| 2013 | 86.0% | +1.5% |
| 2014 | 87.6% | +1.9% |
| 2015 | 89.0% | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 89.4% | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 89.9% | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 91.1% | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 91.6% | +0.5% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 91.6% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 89.1%, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 91.6% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 98.9%, 93% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.1% | 76.1% | 76.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 87.0% | 80.0% | 91.6% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 126 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 92.1% compare
- 127 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 92.0% compare
- 128 Sri Lanka 91.8% compare
- 130 Tanzania, United Republic of 91.5% compare
- 131 Lao People's Democratic Republic 91.3% compare
- 132 Tunisia 91.1% compare
More private sector data for Kyrgyzstan
- Merchandise trade 69.9% (2025)
- Food imports 12.6% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 74.4% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 12.97 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 11.7% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 32.3% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 2.85 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 388.39 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -44.54 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan?
- Getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Kyrgyzstan was 91.6% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 91.6% in 2019.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 76.1% in 2009.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 129th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.