Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) was 91.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka, 2009–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka stood at 91.8%. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and up 17.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka peaked at 91.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 78.3%, in 2009.
Sri Lanka ranks 128th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 78.3% | — |
| 2010 | 80.5% | +2.9% |
| 2011 | 83.2% | +3.3% |
| 2012 | 85.3% | +2.6% |
| 2013 | 87.4% | +2.5% |
| 2014 | 87.3% | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 88.9% | +1.9% |
| 2016 | 90.3% | +1.5% |
| 2017 | 90.1% | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 91.2% | +1.2% |
| 2019 | 91.8% | +0.6% |
Sri Lanka compared with similar countries
- Sri Lanka's 91.8% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 96.6%, 95% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Sri Lanka's 91.8% is below the median for South Asia, which is 93.5%, 98% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.3% | 78.3% | 78.3% | 1 |
| 2010s | 87.6% | 80.5% | 91.8% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 125 Marshall Islands 92.1% compare
- 126 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 92.1% compare
- 127 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 92.0% compare
- 129 Kyrgyzstan 91.6% compare
- 130 Tanzania, United Republic of 91.5% compare
- 131 Lao People's Democratic Republic 91.3% compare
More private sector data for Sri Lanka
- Merchandise trade 32.2% (2025)
- Food imports 15.3% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 59.7% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 21.48 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 27.3% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 66.0% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 13.58 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 624.24 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1248 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 6.33 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka?
- Getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) in Sri Lanka was 91.8% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 91.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 78.3% in 2009.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.