Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus
Belarus: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score was 100 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus, 2009–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Belarus stood at 100. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 200.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Belarus peaked at 100 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2009.
Belarus ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 33.33 | — |
| 2010 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 | +200.0% |
| 2017 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 | +0.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 100 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 66.67, 1.5× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 100 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 66.67, 1.5× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 1 |
| 2010s | 60 | 33.33 | 100 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 1 China 100 compare
- 1 Russia 100 compare
- 1 Japan 100 compare
- 1 Armenia 100 compare
- 1 Comoros 100 compare
- 1 Czechia 100 compare
- 1 Georgia 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 South Korea 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Malaysia 100 compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 compare
- 1 Micronesia (country) 100 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 100 compare
- 1 San Marino 100 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100 compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 compare
- 1 Sweden 100 compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 compare
- 1 Taiwan 100 compare
- 1 Thailand 100 compare
- 1 East Timor 100 compare
- 1 Togo 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 100 compare
More private sector data for Belarus
- Merchandise trade 96.1% (2025)
- Food imports 10.3% (2021)
- Manufactures imports 49.4% (2021)
- Merchandise imports 48.37 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 16.6% (2021)
- Manufactures exports 38.4% (2021)
- Merchandise exports 41.40 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 4,556 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.4432 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 2.61 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Belarus?
- Getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Belarus was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2016.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Belarus ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 200.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.