Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency … Score in Guatemala
Guatemala: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency … Score was 87.5 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Guatemala, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Guatemala recorded 87.5 for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Guatemala ranks 28th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency … Score in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 87.5 | — |
| 2015 | 75 | -14.3% |
| 2016 | 87.5 | +16.7% |
| 2017 | 87.5 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 87.5 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 87.5 | +0.0% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 87.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 62.5, 1.4× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 87.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 62.5, 1.4× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 27 United States 90 compare
- 28 China 87.5 compare
- 28 Mexico 87.5 compare
- 28 Australia 87.5 compare
- 28 Austria 87.5 compare
- 28 Azerbaijan 87.5 compare
- 28 Brunei 87.5 compare
- 28 Chile 87.5 compare
- 28 Croatia 87.5 compare
- 28 Denmark 87.5 compare
- 28 Dominica 87.5 compare
- 28 Ecuador 87.5 compare
- 28 Greece 87.5 compare
- 28 Hungary 87.5 compare
- 28 Iceland 87.5 compare
- 28 Italy 87.5 compare
- 28 Latvia 87.5 compare
- 28 Luxembourg 87.5 compare
- 28 Moldova 87.5 compare
- 28 Morocco 87.5 compare
- 28 New Zealand 87.5 compare
- 28 Oman 87.5 compare
- 28 Poland 87.5 compare
- 28 Portugal 87.5 compare
- 28 Romania 87.5 compare
- 28 Singapore 87.5 compare
- 28 Saint Lucia 87.5 compare
- 28 Switzerland 87.5 compare
- 28 Taiwan 87.5 compare
- 28 Ukraine 87.5 compare
- 28 Vietnam 87.5 compare
More private sector data for Guatemala
- Merchandise trade 40.7% (2025)
- Food imports 16.9% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 65.9% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 34.61 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 6.89 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 46.8% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 45.2% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 15.56 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 4.76 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 832.52 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Guatemala?
- Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Guatemala was 87.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 87.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 75 in 2015.
- How does Guatemala rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Guatemala ranks 28th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.