Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency … Score in Saint Lucia
Saint Lucia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency … Score was 87.5 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Saint Lucia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Saint Lucia stood at 87.5. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of up 16.7% over ten years.
Saint Lucia ranks 28th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency … Score in Saint Lucia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 75 | — |
| 2015 | 75 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 87.5 | +16.7% |
| 2017 | 87.5 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 87.5 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 87.5 | +0.0% |
Saint Lucia compared with similar countries
- Saint Lucia's 87.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 62.5, 1.4× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Saint Lucia's 87.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 62.5, 1.4× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Saint Lucia
- 27 United States 90 compare
- 28 China 87.5 compare
- 28 Mexico 87.5 compare
- 28 Australia 87.5 compare
- 28 Austria 87.5 compare
- 28 Azerbaijan 87.5 compare
- 28 Brunei 87.5 compare
- 28 Chile 87.5 compare
- 28 Croatia 87.5 compare
- 28 Denmark 87.5 compare
- 28 Dominica 87.5 compare
- 28 Ecuador 87.5 compare
- 28 Greece 87.5 compare
- 28 Guatemala 87.5 compare
- 28 Hungary 87.5 compare
- 28 Iceland 87.5 compare
- 28 Italy 87.5 compare
- 28 Latvia 87.5 compare
- 28 Luxembourg 87.5 compare
- 28 Moldova 87.5 compare
- 28 Morocco 87.5 compare
- 28 New Zealand 87.5 compare
- 28 Oman 87.5 compare
- 28 Poland 87.5 compare
- 28 Portugal 87.5 compare
- 28 Romania 87.5 compare
- 28 Singapore 87.5 compare
- 28 Switzerland 87.5 compare
- 28 Taiwan 87.5 compare
- 28 Ukraine 87.5 compare
- 28 Vietnam 87.5 compare
More private sector data for Saint Lucia
- Merchandise trade 41.2% (2025)
- Food imports 27.6% (2020)
- Manufactures imports 57.0% (2020)
- Merchandise imports 1.01 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 671.73 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 41.6% (2020)
- Manufactures exports 45.9% (2020)
- Merchandise exports 85.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 1.40 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 471.83 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Saint Lucia?
- Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Saint Lucia was 87.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Saint Lucia?
- The highest recorded value was 87.5 in 2016.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Saint Lucia?
- The lowest recorded value was 75 in 2014.
- How does Saint Lucia rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Saint Lucia ranks 28th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff rising or falling in Saint Lucia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Saint Lucia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.