Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar

Myanmar: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
1 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
138th
of 187 countries
All-time high
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar, 2014–2019

00.20.40.60.812014201620192014: 0 DB16-20 methodology2015: 0 DB16-20 methodology2016: 0 DB16-20 methodology2017: 0 DB16-20 methodology2018: 1 DB16-20 methodology2019: 1 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

Myanmar recorded 1 DB16-20 methodology for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That places Myanmar 138th out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) in Myanmar, 2014 to 2019.
Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2014 0 DB16-20 methodology
2015 0 DB16-20 methodology
2016 0 DB16-20 methodology
2017 0 DB16-20 methodology
2018 1 DB16-20 methodology
2019 1 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Myanmar

  1. 135 Angola 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 135 Honduras 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 135 Solomon Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 138 Cape Verde 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 140 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology
  6. 140 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
  7. 140 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  8. 140 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology
  9. 140 Botswana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  10. 140 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology
  11. 140 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology
  12. 140 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  13. 140 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  14. 140 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
  15. 140 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
  16. 140 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0 DB16-20 methodology
  17. 140 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  18. 140 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  19. 140 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  20. 140 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  21. 140 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  22. 140 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  23. 140 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  24. 140 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 140 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  26. 140 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology
  27. 140 Kiribati 0 DB16-20 methodology
  28. 140 Lebanon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  29. 140 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology
  30. 140 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  31. 140 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology
  32. 140 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  33. 140 Malawi 0 DB16-20 methodology
  34. 140 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology
  35. 140 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology
  36. 140 Marshall Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology
  37. 140 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology
  38. 140 Micronesia, Federated States of 0 DB16-20 methodology
  39. 140 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology
  40. 140 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology
  41. 140 Palau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  42. 140 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  43. 140 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology
  44. 140 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology
  45. 140 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology
  46. 140 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology
  47. 140 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  48. 140 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
  49. 140 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  50. 140 Timor-Leste 0 DB16-20 methodology
  51. 140 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology
  52. 140 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Myanmar

All data for Myanmar →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar?
Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Myanmar?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Myanmar?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does Myanmar rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
Myanmar ranks 138th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Myanmar data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20/myanmar/">Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Myanmar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index is calculated on the basis of the following six components: (i) duration and frequency of power outages, (ii) tools to monitor power outages, (iii) tools to restore power supply, (iv) regulatory monitoring of utilities’ performance, (v) financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages, and (vi) transparency and accessibility of tariffs. An economy is eligible to obtain a score on the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index only if (i) the utility collects data on all types of outages (average total duration of outages per customer and the average number of outages per customer), including planned and unplanned outages, as well as load shedding, with the minimum outage time of not more than 5 minutes; and (ii) the SAIDI value is below a threshold of 100 hours and the SAIFI value is under 100 outages. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.