Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages … 0-3 in Laos

Laos: Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages … 0-3 was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
109th
of 187 countries
All-time high
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2017
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in Laos, 2014–2019

00.20.40.60.812014201620192014: 0 DB16-20 methodology2015: 0 DB16-20 methodology2016: 0 DB16-20 methodology2017: 1 DB16-20 methodology2018: 0 DB16-20 methodology2019: 0 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per in Laos stood at 0 DB16-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

That places Laos 109th out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages … 0-3 in Laos, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) in Laos, 2014 to 2019.
Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2014 0 DB16-20 methodology —
2015 0 DB16-20 methodology —
2016 0 DB16-20 methodology —
2017 1 DB16-20 methodology —
2018 0 DB16-20 methodology -100.0%
2019 0 DB16-20 methodology —

Laos compared with similar countries

  • Laos's 0 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.5 DB16-20 methodology. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Laos

  1. 109 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology
  2. 109 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
  3. 109 Pakistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  4. 109 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  5. 109 Albania 0 DB16-20 methodology
  6. 109 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 109 Argentina 0 DB16-20 methodology
  8. 109 Belize 0 DB16-20 methodology
  9. 109 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology
  10. 109 Botswana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  11. 109 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology
  12. 109 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology
  13. 109 Cape Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology
  14. 109 Cambodia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  15. 109 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  16. 109 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  17. 109 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
  18. 109 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
  19. 109 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  20. 109 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  21. 109 Cote d'Ivoire 0 DB16-20 methodology
  22. 109 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  23. 109 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  24. 109 Eswatini 0 DB16-20 methodology
  25. 109 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  26. 109 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  27. 109 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  28. 109 Ghana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  29. 109 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  30. 109 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  31. 109 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  32. 109 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  33. 109 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology
  34. 109 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology
  35. 109 Jamaica 0 DB16-20 methodology
  36. 109 Kiribati 0 DB16-20 methodology
  37. 109 Lebanon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  38. 109 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology
  39. 109 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  40. 109 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology
  41. 109 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  42. 109 Malawi 0 DB16-20 methodology
  43. 109 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology
  44. 109 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology
  45. 109 Marshall Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology
  46. 109 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology
  47. 109 Micronesia (country) 0 DB16-20 methodology
  48. 109 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  49. 109 Montenegro 0 DB16-20 methodology
  50. 109 Mozambique 0 DB16-20 methodology
  51. 109 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  52. 109 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology
  53. 109 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology
  54. 109 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology
  55. 109 North Macedonia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  56. 109 Palau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  57. 109 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  58. 109 Paraguay 0 DB16-20 methodology
  59. 109 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  60. 109 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology
  61. 109 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology
  62. 109 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology
  63. 109 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology
  64. 109 South Africa 0 DB16-20 methodology
  65. 109 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology
  66. 109 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology
  67. 109 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  68. 109 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
  69. 109 Syria 0 DB16-20 methodology
  70. 109 Tanzania 0 DB16-20 methodology
  71. 109 East Timor 0 DB16-20 methodology
  72. 109 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  73. 109 Tonga 0 DB16-20 methodology
  74. 109 Turkey 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  75. 109 Uganda 0 DB16-20 methodology
  76. 109 Venezuela 0 DB16-20 methodology
  77. 109 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  78. 109 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Laos

All data for Laos →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per in Laos?
Getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per in Laos was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per recorded in Laos?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2017.
What is the lowest getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per recorded in Laos?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does Laos rank for getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per?
Laos ranks 109th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Laos data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in Laos. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-total-duration-and-frequency-of-outages-per-customer-a-year-0-3-db16/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-total-duration-and-frequency-of-outages-per-customer-a-year-0-3-db16/lao-pdr/">Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in Laos</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year index evaluates the quality of the power supply. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 12 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each month) or below, a score of 1 is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 4 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each quarter) or below, 1 additional point is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 1 (equivalent to an outage of one hour per year) or below, 1 more point is assigned. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.