Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia

North Macedonia: Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
109th
of 187 countries
All-time high
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2016
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia, 2014–2019

00.20.40.60.812014201620192014: 0 DB16-20 methodology2015: 0 DB16-20 methodology2016: 1 DB16-20 methodology2017: 0 DB16-20 methodology2018: 0 DB16-20 methodology2019: 0 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

North Macedonia recorded 0 DB16-20 methodology for getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

North Macedonia ranks 109th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) in North Macedonia, 2014 to 2019.
Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2014 0 DB16-20 methodology
2015 0 DB16-20 methodology
2016 1 DB16-20 methodology
2017 0 DB16-20 methodology -100.0%
2018 0 DB16-20 methodology
2019 0 DB16-20 methodology

Countries ranked near North Macedonia

  1. 109 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology
  2. 109 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
  3. 109 Pakistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  4. 109 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  5. 109 Albania 0 DB16-20 methodology
  6. 109 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 109 Argentina 0 DB16-20 methodology
  8. 109 Belize 0 DB16-20 methodology
  9. 109 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology
  10. 109 Botswana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  11. 109 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology
  12. 109 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology
  13. 109 Cape Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology
  14. 109 Cambodia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  15. 109 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  16. 109 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  17. 109 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
  18. 109 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
  19. 109 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0 DB16-20 methodology
  20. 109 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  21. 109 Côte d'Ivoire 0 DB16-20 methodology
  22. 109 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  23. 109 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  24. 109 Eswatini 0 DB16-20 methodology
  25. 109 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  26. 109 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  27. 109 Gambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  28. 109 Ghana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  29. 109 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  30. 109 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  31. 109 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  32. 109 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  33. 109 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology
  34. 109 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology
  35. 109 Jamaica 0 DB16-20 methodology
  36. 109 Kiribati 0 DB16-20 methodology
  37. 109 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 109 Lebanon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  39. 109 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology
  40. 109 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  41. 109 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology
  42. 109 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  43. 109 Malawi 0 DB16-20 methodology
  44. 109 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology
  45. 109 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology
  46. 109 Marshall Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology
  47. 109 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology
  48. 109 Micronesia, Federated States of 0 DB16-20 methodology
  49. 109 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  50. 109 Montenegro 0 DB16-20 methodology
  51. 109 Mozambique 0 DB16-20 methodology
  52. 109 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  53. 109 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology
  54. 109 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology
  55. 109 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology
  56. 109 Palau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  57. 109 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  58. 109 Paraguay 0 DB16-20 methodology
  59. 109 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  60. 109 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology
  61. 109 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology
  62. 109 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology
  63. 109 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology
  64. 109 South Africa 0 DB16-20 methodology
  65. 109 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology
  66. 109 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology
  67. 109 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  68. 109 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
  69. 109 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  70. 109 Tanzania, United Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology
  71. 109 Timor-Leste 0 DB16-20 methodology
  72. 109 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  73. 109 Tonga 0 DB16-20 methodology
  74. 109 Türkiye 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  75. 109 Uganda 0 DB16-20 methodology
  76. 109 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology
  77. 109 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  78. 109 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for North Macedonia

All data for North Macedonia →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia?
Getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per recorded in North Macedonia?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
What is the lowest getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per recorded in North Macedonia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does North Macedonia rank for getting electricity: total duration and frequency of outages per?
North Macedonia ranks 109th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-total-duration-and-frequency-of-outages-per-customer-a-year-0-3-db16/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-total-duration-and-frequency-of-outages-per-customer-a-year-0-3-db16/north-macedonia/">Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per in North Macedonia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year index evaluates the quality of the power supply. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 12 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each month) or below, a score of 1 is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 4 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each quarter) or below, 1 additional point is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 1 (equivalent to an outage of one hour per year) or below, 1 more point is assigned. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.