Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced was 2.73 1=low to 5=high in 2022. ▲ Rising
Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 2007–2022
Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) is 2.73 1=low to 5=high, measured in 2022.
The figure is up 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 2.84 1=low to 5=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 2.35 1=low to 5=high, in 2007.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 22nd of 47 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 5=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2.35 1=low to 5=high | — |
| 2010 | 2.84 1=low to 5=high | +21.1% |
| 2012 | 2.59 1=low to 5=high | -9.0% |
| 2014 | 2.73 1=low to 5=high | +5.6% |
| 2016 | 2.49 1=low to 5=high | -8.7% |
| 2018 | 2.63 1=low to 5=high | +5.3% |
| 2022 | 2.73 1=low to 5=high | +3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.35 1=low to 5=high | 2.35 1=low to 5=high | 2.35 1=low to 5=high | 1 |
| 2010s | 2.66 1=low to 5=high | 2.49 1=low to 5=high | 2.84 1=low to 5=high | 5 |
| 2020s | 2.73 1=low to 5=high | 2.73 1=low to 5=high | 2.73 1=low to 5=high | 1 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 21 India 3.5 1=low to 5=high compare
- 21 Israel 3.5 1=low to 5=high compare
- 21 Thailand 3.5 1=low to 5=high compare
- 21 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 3.5 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Czechia 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Estonia 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Hungary 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Italy 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Korea 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Lithuania 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Oman 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Romania 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Slovenia 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Sweden 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 Türkiye 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
- 25 United States of America 3.4 1=low to 5=high compare
More private sector data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Merchandise trade 49.0% (2025)
- Food imports 8.4% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 64.1% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 796.25 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 17.5% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 52.5% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 584.92 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 2,309 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2077 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 2.23 % change on previous year (2025)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 2.73 1=low to 5=high in 2022, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 2.84 1=low to 5=high in 2010.
- What is the lowest logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.35 1=low to 5=high in 2007.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 22nd out of 47 groups with data for 2022.
- Is logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.