Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income

Upper middle income: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process was 2.57 1=low to 5=high in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
2.57 1=low to 5=high
Rank
19th
of 45 groups
All-time high
2.6 1=low to 5=high
in 2014
All-time low
2.36 1=low to 5=high
in 2010
Years of data
7
2007–2022

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income, 2007–2022

01232007201420222007: 2.4 1=low to 5=high2010: 2.4 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.5 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.6 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.5 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.5 1=low to 5=high2022: 2.6 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

In 2022, logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income stood at 2.57 1=low to 5=high.

The figure is up 4.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income peaked at 2.6 1=low to 5=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.36 1=low to 5=high, in 2010.

That places Upper middle income 19th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high) in Upper middle income, 2007 to 2022.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 2.42 1=low to 5=high
2010 2.36 1=low to 5=high -2.5%
2012 2.47 1=low to 5=high +4.7%
2014 2.6 1=low to 5=high +5.3%
2016 2.49 1=low to 5=high -4.0%
2018 2.49 1=low to 5=high +0.0%
2022 2.57 1=low to 5=high +3.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.42 1=low to 5=high 2.42 1=low to 5=high 2.42 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.48 1=low to 5=high 2.36 1=low to 5=high 2.6 1=low to 5=high 5
2020s 2.57 1=low to 5=high 2.57 1=low to 5=high 2.57 1=low to 5=high 1

Countries ranked near Upper middle income

  1. 20 Luxembourg 3.6 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 20 Spain 3.6 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 22 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 3.5 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Upper middle income

All data for Upper middle income →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income?
Logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income was 2.57 1=low to 5=high in 2022, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in Upper middle income?
The highest recorded value was 2.6 1=low to 5=high in 2014.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process recorded in Upper middle income?
The lowest recorded value was 2.36 1=low to 5=high in 2010.
How does Upper middle income rank for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Upper middle income ranks 19th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
Is logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process rising or falling in Upper middle income?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/upper-middle-income/">Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Upper middle income</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.