Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa

South Africa: Protecting investors, director liability index was 8 in 2012. ▬ Flat

Latest (2012)
8
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
2nd
of 51 countries
All-time high
8
in 2005
All-time low
8
in 2005
Years of data
8
2005–2012

Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa, 2005–2012

024682005200820122005: 82006: 82007: 82008: 82009: 82010: 82011: 82012: 8

Source: World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).

Analysis

South Africa recorded 8 for protecting investors, director liability index in 2012. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places South Africa 2nd out of 51 countries with data for 2012, putting it in the top 10%.

Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa, 2005 to 2012.
Year Value Change
2005 8
2006 8 +0.0%
2007 8 +0.0%
2008 8 +0.0%
2009 8 +0.0%
2010 8 +0.0%
2011 8 +0.0%
2012 8 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8 8 8 5
2010s 8 8 8 3

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 1 Rwanda 9 compare
  2. 2 Botswana 8 compare
  3. 2 Mauritius 8 compare
  4. 2 Seychelles 8 compare

See the full ranking of 57 places →

More private sector data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa?
Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa was 8 in 2012, according to World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).
What is the highest protecting investors, director liability index recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 8 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting investors, director liability index recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 8 in 2005.
How does South Africa rank for protecting investors, director liability index?
South Africa ranks 2nd out of 51 countries with data for 2012.
Is protecting investors, director liability index rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as part of Protecting investors, director liability index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-investors-director-liability-index/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-investors-director-liability-index/south-africa/">Protecting investors, director liability index in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting investors, director liability index
Source
World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 455 data points, 2005–2012
Last refreshed

Director liability index measures a plaintiff’s ability to hold directors of firms liable for damages to the company, that is, measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against directors’ misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protection: transparency of transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The data come from a survey of corporate lawyers and are based on company laws, court rules of evidence and securities regulations. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.