Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Japan

Japan: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 64.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
64.8%
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
106th
of 191 countries
All-time high
73.0%
in 2004
All-time low
0.0%
in 2006
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Japan, 2004–2019

0204060802004201120192004: 732005: 732006: 02007: 02008: 66.42009: 66.42010: 66.42011: 65.42012: 64.72013: 64.72014: 64.82015: 64.82016: 64.82017: 64.82018: 64.82019: 64.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Japan recorded 64.8% for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in 2019.

That represents a change of down 2.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Japan peaked at 73.0% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2006.

Japan ranks 106th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Japan, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 73.0%
2005 73.0% -0.0%
2006 0.0% -100.0%
2007 0.0%
2008 66.4%
2009 66.4% -0.0%
2010 66.4% -0.0%
2011 65.4% -1.5%
2012 64.7% -1.0%
2013 64.7% +0.0%
2014 64.8% +0.1%
2015 64.8% +0.0%
2016 64.8% +0.0%
2017 64.8% +0.0%
2018 64.8% +0.0%
2019 64.8% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 46.5% 0.0% 73.0% 6
2010s 65.0% 64.7% 66.4% 10

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 103 Sri Lanka 65.7% compare
  2. 104 Papua New Guinea 65.6% compare
  3. 105 Tanzania, United Republic of 65.5% compare
  4. 107 Australia 64.3% compare
  5. 108 Guinea-Bissau 63.9% compare
  6. 109 Djibouti 62.6% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Japan?
Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Japan was 64.8% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 73.0% in 2004.
What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2006.
How does Japan rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
Japan ranks 106th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/japan/">Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,949 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.