Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Bhutan
Bhutan: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 72.56 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Bhutan, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Bhutan recorded 72.56 for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in 2019.
The figure is down 0.0% over five years.
That places Bhutan 52nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Bhutan
More private sector data for Bhutan
- Merchandise trade 83.3% (2025)
- Food imports 11.4% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 70.4% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 2.18 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 5.9% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 58.7% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 800.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 257.09 million current US$ (2024)
- Transport services 21.6% (2024)
- Computer, communications and other services 20.1% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Bhutan?
- Registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Bhutan was 72.56 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 72.57 in 2016.
- What is the lowest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 72.55 in 2017.
- How does Bhutan rank for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 52nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.