Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Guyana
Guyana: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 55.7 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Guyana, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Guyana recorded 55.7 for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of up 9.5% over five years.
That places Guyana 126th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Guyana
More private sector data for Guyana
- Merchandise trade 106.7% (2025)
- Food imports 6.5% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 83.1% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 10.22 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 1.5% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 0.5% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 18.69 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 523.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Transport services 12.9% (2023)
- Computer, communications and other services 83.9% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Guyana?
- Registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Guyana was 55.7 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Guyana?
- The highest recorded value was 55.7 in 2018.
- What is the lowest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Guyana?
- The lowest recorded value was 50.86 in 2015.
- How does Guyana rank for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Guyana ranks 126th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Guyana data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.