Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Norway
Norway: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 87.26 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Norway, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Norway is 87.26, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is up 0.0% over five years.
Norway ranks 15th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Countries ranked near Norway
More private sector data for Norway
- Merchandise trade 52.4% (2025)
- Food imports 11.1% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 73.4% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 107.32 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 10.8% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 17.3% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 170.57 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 63.33 billion current US$ (2025)
- Transport services 17.3% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 52.2% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Norway?
- Registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Norway was 87.26 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 87.26 in 2019.
- What is the lowest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 87.26 in 2015.
- How does Norway rank for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Norway ranks 15th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.