Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Sudan
Sudan: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 63.69 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Sudan stood at 63.69. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.2% over five years.
That places Sudan 94th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Sudan
More private sector data for Sudan
- Merchandise trade 15.0% (2025)
- Food imports 29.9% (2018)
- Manufactures imports 56.0% (2018)
- Merchandise imports 6.20 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 50.6% (2018)
- Manufactures exports 1.1% (2018)
- Merchandise exports 2.80 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 1.52 billion current US$ (2022)
- Transport services 81.5% (2022)
- Computer, communications and other services 13.1% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Sudan?
- Registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score in Sudan was 63.69 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 63.69 in 2019.
- What is the lowest registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 63.57 in 2015.
- How does Sudan rank for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Sudan ranks 94th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.