Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) in San Marino
San Marino: Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) in San Marino, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
San Marino recorded 6 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places San Marino 41st out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) in San Marino, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 6 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 6 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 6 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 6 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
San Marino compared with similar countries
- San Marino's 6 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 6 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- San Marino's 6 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 6 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near San Marino
- 41 Bahrain 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Belgium 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Bhutan 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Cote d'Ivoire 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Croatia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Ecuador 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Fiji 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 France 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Germany 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Honduras 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Israel 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Italy 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Jordan 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Kiribati 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Kyrgyzstan 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Latvia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Luxembourg 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 New Zealand 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Paraguay 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Romania 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Senegal 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Seychelles 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Slovakia 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Switzerland 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Tonga 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 41 Uruguay 6 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for San Marino
- Commercial service imports 934.52 million current US$ (2024)
- Commercial service exports 1.26 billion current US$ (2024)
- Transport services 31.6% (2024)
- Computer, communications and other services 37.6% (2024)
- Computer, communications and other services 59.1% (2024)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per capita 36,782 current US$ per person (2023)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.6144 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Commercial service imports (current US$), per capita 26,404 current US$ per person (2023)
- Travel services 27.5% (2024)
- Travel services 33.9% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) in San Marino?
- Registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) in San Marino was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) recorded in San Marino?
- The highest recorded value was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) recorded in San Marino?
- The lowest recorded value was 6 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does San Marino rank for registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8)?
- San Marino ranks 41st out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this San Marino data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The land dispute resolution index measures the accessibility of conflict resolution mechanisms and the extent of liability for entities or agents recording land transactions. It has eight components: (i) whether the law requires that all property sale transactions be registered at the immovable property registry to make them opposable to third parties; (ii) whether the formal system of immovable property registration is subject to a guarantee; (iii) whether there is a specific, out-of-court compensation mechanism to cover for losses incurred by parties who engaged in good faith in a property transaction based on erroneous information certified by the immovable property registry; (iv) whether the legal system requires verification of the legal validity of the documents (such as the sales, transfer or conveyance deed) necessary for a property transaction; (v) whether the legal system requires verification of the identity of the parties to a property transaction; (vi) whether there is a national database to verify the accuracy of identity documents; (vii) how much time it takes to obtain a decision from a court of first instance (without an appeal) in a standard land dispute between two local businesses over tenure rights worth 50 times income per capita and located in the largest business city; and (viii) whether there are publicly available statistics on the number of land disputes in the first instance. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.