Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) in Palestine
Palestine: Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) in Palestine, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) in Palestine is 3.5 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Palestine ranks 149th of 187 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) in Palestine, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Palestine compared with similar countries
- Palestine's 3.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 4.25 DB16-20 methodology, 82% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Palestine's 3.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 5 DB16-20 methodology, 70% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Palestine
- 149 India 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Pakistan 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Belize 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Bolivia 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Burundi 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Cameroon 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Congo 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Guyana 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Haiti 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Jamaica 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Montenegro 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Myanmar 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Nicaragua 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Puerto Rico 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Sierra Leone 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Trinidad and Tobago 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 149 Yemen 3.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Palestine
- Food imports 30.9% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 45.9% (2023)
- Commercial service imports 1.23 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 21.4% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 63.3% (2023)
- Commercial service exports 558.70 million current US$ (2025)
- Transport services 47.1% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 8.6% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 64.7% (2025)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per capita 103.2 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) in Palestine?
- Registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) in Palestine was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) recorded in Palestine?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8) recorded in Palestine?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Palestine rank for registering property: land dispute resolution index (0-8)?
- Palestine ranks 149th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Palestine data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Land dispute resolution index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The land dispute resolution index measures the accessibility of conflict resolution mechanisms and the extent of liability for entities or agents recording land transactions. It has eight components: (i) whether the law requires that all property sale transactions be registered at the immovable property registry to make them opposable to third parties; (ii) whether the formal system of immovable property registration is subject to a guarantee; (iii) whether there is a specific, out-of-court compensation mechanism to cover for losses incurred by parties who engaged in good faith in a property transaction based on erroneous information certified by the immovable property registry; (iv) whether the legal system requires verification of the legal validity of the documents (such as the sales, transfer or conveyance deed) necessary for a property transaction; (v) whether the legal system requires verification of the identity of the parties to a property transaction; (vi) whether there is a national database to verify the accuracy of identity documents; (vii) how much time it takes to obtain a decision from a court of first instance (without an appeal) in a standard land dispute between two local businesses over tenure rights worth 50 times income per capita and located in the largest business city; and (viii) whether there are publicly available statistics on the number of land disputes in the first instance. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.