Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
183rd
of 187 countries
All-time high
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan, 2015–2019

01232015201720192015: 3 DB17-20 methodology2016: 3 DB17-20 methodology2017: 3 DB17-20 methodology2018: 3 DB17-20 methodology2019: 3 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan stood at 3 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

That places Afghanistan 183rd out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Afghanistan, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 3 DB17-20 methodology
2016 3 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 3 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 181 Congo 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 181 Liberia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 183 Bahamas 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 183 Central African Republic 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 183 Guinea-Bissau 3 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Afghanistan rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Afghanistan ranks 183rd out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/afghanistan/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Afghanistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.