Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 12.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
12.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
up 8.7%
World rank
105th
of 187 countries
All-time high
12.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
All-time low
11.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso, 2015–2019

02.557.51012.52015201720192015: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 12.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Burkina Faso recorded 12.5 DB17-20 methodology for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 8.7% on the previous year and up 8.7% over five years.

Burkina Faso ranks 105th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Burkina Faso, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 11.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 11.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 11.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 11.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 12.5 DB17-20 methodology +8.7%

Countries ranked near Burkina Faso

  1. 105 Honduras 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 105 Malta 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 105 Philippines 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 105 Samoa 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Burkina Faso

All data for Burkina Faso →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso was 12.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Burkina Faso?
The highest recorded value was 12.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Burkina Faso?
The lowest recorded value was 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Burkina Faso rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Burkina Faso ranks 105th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/burkina-faso/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Burkina Faso</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.