Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines

Philippines: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 12.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
12.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
105th
of 187 countries
All-time high
12.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
11.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines, 2015–2019

02.557.51012.52015201720192015: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 11.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 12.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 12.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines stood at 12.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 8.7% over five years.

Philippines ranks 105th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Philippines, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 11.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 11.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 11.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 12.5 DB17-20 methodology +8.7%
2019 12.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Philippines

  1. 105 Burkina Faso 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 105 Honduras 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 105 Malta 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 105 Samoa 12.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Philippines

All data for Philippines →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines was 12.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Philippines?
The highest recorded value was 12.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Philippines?
The lowest recorded value was 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Philippines rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Philippines ranks 105th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Philippines data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/philippines/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Philippines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.