Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Bhutan
Bhutan: Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) was 7 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Bhutan, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Bhutan is 7 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Bhutan ranks 29th of 187 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 7 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 7 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 7 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 7 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 29 United States of America 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Armenia 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Australia 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Austria 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Belarus 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Canada 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Cyprus 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Denmark 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 France 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Germany 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Iceland 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Jordan 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Kenya 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Kosovo 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Malaysia 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Mauritius 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Montenegro 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Morocco 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Netherlands 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Norway 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Peru 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Poland 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Puerto Rico 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Spain 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Switzerland 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Uruguay 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 29 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 7 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Bhutan
- Merchandise trade 83.3% (2025)
- Food imports 11.4% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 70.4% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 2.18 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 5.9% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 58.7% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 800.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,004 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2235 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 7.1 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Bhutan?
- Registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Bhutan was 7 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 7 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 7 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Bhutan rank for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)?
- Bhutan ranks 29th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an electronic database for checking for encumbrances; (iii) how maps of land plots are kept at the mapping agency of the largest business city of the economy; (iv) whether there is a geographic information system—an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information; (v) how the land ownership registry and mapping agency are linked; and (vi) how immovable property is identified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.