Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Lao People's Democratic Republic
Lao People's Democratic Republic: Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Lao People's Democratic Republic, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Lao People's Democratic Republic recorded 2 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Lao People's Democratic Republic 122nd out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Lao People's Democratic Republic, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Lao People's Democratic Republic
- 121 Pakistan 2.1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Burkina Faso 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Chile 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Comoros 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Eritrea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Mauritania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Mozambique 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Namibia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Philippines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Somalia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Saint Lucia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Syrian Arab Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 122 Tonga 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Merchandise trade 124.1% (2025)
- Food imports 12.7% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 61.7% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 10.34 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 23.2% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 32.8% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 12.38 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,572 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.6762 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 31.87 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Lao People's Democratic Republic was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) recorded in Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) recorded in Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Lao People's Democratic Republic rank for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 122nd out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Lao People's Democratic Republic data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an electronic database for checking for encumbrances; (iii) how maps of land plots are kept at the mapping agency of the largest business city of the economy; (iv) whether there is a geographic information system—an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information; (v) how the land ownership registry and mapping agency are linked; and (vi) how immovable property is identified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.