Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index … 0-8 in Palestine
Palestine: Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index … 0-8 was 5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Palestine, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Palestine recorded 5 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places Palestine 76th out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index … 0-8 in Palestine, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Palestine compared with similar countries
- Palestine's 5 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 2.5× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Palestine's 5 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 4.5 DB16-20 methodology, 1.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Palestine
- 76 Indonesia 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Mexico 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Argentina 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Belgium 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Belize 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Brunei 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Costa Rica 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 El Salvador 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Jamaica 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Oman 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Romania 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 San Marino 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Saudi Arabia 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Serbia 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 South Africa 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Suriname 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Ukraine 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 76 Uzbekistan 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Palestine
- Food imports 30.9% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 45.9% (2023)
- Commercial service imports 1.23 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 21.4% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 63.3% (2023)
- Commercial service exports 558.70 million current US$ (2025)
- Transport services 47.1% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 8.6% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 64.7% (2025)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per capita 103.2 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Palestine?
- Registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) in Palestine was 5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) recorded in Palestine?
- The highest recorded value was 5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) recorded in Palestine?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Palestine rank for registering property: reliability of infrastructure index (0-8)?
- Palestine ranks 76th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Palestine data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The reliability of infrastructure index assesses whether the land registry and cadaster have adequate infrastructure to guarantee high standards and reduce the risk of errors. It has six components: (i) how land titles are kept at the registry of the largest business city of the economy; (ii) whether there is an electronic database for checking for encumbrances; (iii) how maps of land plots are kept at the mapping agency of the largest business city of the economy; (iv) whether there is a geographic information system—an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information; (v) how the land ownership registry and mapping agency are linked; and (vi) how immovable property is identified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.