Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
65.74
in 2019
Ecuador
66.42
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
116th
Ecuador rank
113th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Ecuador
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 66.42 against 65.74 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.68.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 116th and Ecuador ranks 113th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 66.42 against 65.74 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
0.68, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 116th and Ecuador ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.