Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador

Ecuador: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 66.42 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
66.42
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
114th
of 191 countries
All-time high
66.42
in 2015
All-time low
66.24
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 66.22015: 66.42016: 66.42017: 66.32018: 66.42019: 66.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Ecuador stood at 66.42.

The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.

Ecuador ranks 114th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 66.24 —
2015 66.42 +0.3%
2016 66.4 -0.0%
2017 66.32 -0.1%
2018 66.38 +0.1%
2019 66.42 +0.1%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 66.42 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 70.92, 94% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 66.42 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 65.74, 1.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 111 Sao Tome and Principe 66.64 compare
  2. 112 Pakistan 66.46 compare
  3. 113 Uganda 66.45 compare
  4. 115 Suriname 66.33 compare
  5. 116 Guinea 65.85 compare
  6. 117 Antigua and Barbuda 65.74 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Ecuador?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Ecuador was 66.42 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 66.42 in 2015.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 66.24 in 2014.
How does Ecuador rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 114th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/ecuador/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.