Azerbaijan vs Mozambique: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Azerbaijan
73.36
in 2019
Mozambique
73.19
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
59th
Mozambique rank
61st

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Mozambique
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 73.36 against 73.19 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.17.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mozambique ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 59th and Mozambique ranks 61st of 188 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Mozambique?
Azerbaijan, at 73.36 against 73.19 in Mozambique as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Mozambique?
0.17, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Mozambique?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Mozambique rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 59th and Mozambique ranks 61st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.