Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Sudan: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 50.51 against 48.57 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.94.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Sudan ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 50.51 against 48.57 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Sudan?
- 1.94, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.